Your rebuttal is almost as cute as it is insidious.
My post is about property destruction. You are using "innocent people who have lost their lives" to refute the idea that the rage felt over the murders of George Floyd et al. is justifiable. Your refutation is based on a false premise, i.e. that my original post somehow said that murder is justifiable.
The second point again relies on a false premise about the original post. You say "no one has been experiencing racial injustice for centuries." My language is different. The phrase was: "the racial injustice that has been going on for centuries." You are changing my language to make your point. And the point is absurd because racial injustice has been going centuries whether or not there are century old individuals who can tell you about it.
In your final non sequitur you attempt to hijack the message entirely to serve your own agenda by bringing up some probably alt-right Obama-caused-the-pandemic theory. My message is about how the destruction of property is its own tragic waste of human life but you haven't even addressed that. Perhaps the real tragedy is that certain people seem to think they can get what they want and buttress their own feeble rhetoric by shouting loudly and taking the language of others out of context. You should be ashamed but I doubt you have read this far.
do NOT contact me with unsolicited services or offers